04.02.2026 Statement for brief on the threat posed by ISIL to international peace and security

Checked Against Delivery

Thank you, Mr. President.

Let me also thank today’s briefers and welcome Minister Elmore to the Chamber today.

Few threats have shown the same ability to endure and adapt as ISIL (Da’esh). Their theatres may differ, but their method is the same: exploiting fragility, grievance, and weak governance. Our response must therefore be collective, principled, and firmly anchored in the rule of law.

Allow me to make three points.

First, Mr. President, is the continued threat across the Sahel.

The Sahel has become the epicentre of global terrorism. ISIL- and Al-Qaida-affiliated groups have consolidated their presence, strengthened cross-border networks, and entrenched themselves in areas marked by weak state control and protracted conflict. The human cost is severe, with growing civilian harm, displacement, and disrupted humanitarian access.

This is not only a regional crisis. It is a direct challenge to Africa beyond the Sahel, as well as to European and international security.

Denmark therefore stresses the need for a stronger and more coherent international response. One that is built around regional cooperation and political ownership and engagement with local actors and civil society.

Second, on Syria.

The comprehensive agreement reached last week between the Syrian transitional government and the SDF is a positive step, including when it comes to combatting Da’esh. However, recent developments underline that Da’esh continues to pose a threat and could exploit moments of transition to regroup, facilitate escapes, and reconstitute operational networks, including through the movement of foreign terrorist fighters.

To address these threats comprehensively, detention facilities and camps must be managed in full compliance with international humanitarian law and human rights law. Relocation of detainees should take place within clear legal frameworks in full transparency. Humane conditions, access for relevant UN actors, and clear arrangements for responsibility and oversight are essential.

Individuals affiliated with Da’esh must be addressed through lawful and predictable frameworks, including prosecution where appropriate. Children in these camps are first and foremost victims of conflict and terrorism. Protecting their rights is both a moral obligation and a security necessity. A lasting response requires rules-based approaches that reduce the risk of renewed recruitment and future attacks, both in Syria and beyond.

Third, Mr. President, on the 1267 sanctions regime.

As Chair of the 1267 Sanctions Committee, we believe it is vital to ensure that the UN sanctions regime for ISIL, Al-Qaida, and associated individuals and entities remains current, operational, and credible.

When individuals are repeatedly identified in UN reporting, this Council should be ready to act — including through listings. A sanctions list that does not reflect today’s terrorist leadership risks losing its effect.

At the same time, integrity matters. Sanctions must be fact-based, timely, and legally robust. Denmark will continue to insist on solid evidence-based foundations, clear narrative summaries, and due process safeguards — so that sanctions remain an effective counter-terrorism tool, not a political instrument.

In closing,

Countering Da’esh is a long-term objective. When these groups adapt, our response must adapt as well.

Adaptation, however, must not come at the expense of our principles. Lawful action, respect for human rights, and inclusive approaches remain essential.

Without these foundations, we risk winning today, while losing tomorrow.

Denmark stands ready to work constructively with all members of this Council to strengthen our shared response to this scourge.

Thank you.